🔗 Share this article

The nation's decisive move to ban social media access for young people below 16 is sparking debate around the globe. Officials, child protection groups, and guardians are watching closely to see if this tactic will set a precedent for other nations.

European Trend

In Europe, a rising number of countries are exploring comparable restrictions.

• The Danish government has announced a prohibition on social media for children under fifteen, with the leader arguing that mobile devices and apps are "stealing our children's innocence". The policy may be passed soon.
• Norway is preparing to enforce a age restriction of 15, citing the need to protect young people from the "influence of the AI".
• Ireland is developing a digital ID system to authenticate the age and identity of social media users. Officials have indicated that an Australia-style ban is "an measures on the table".
• In Spain, the leader has asked parliament to approve a law raising the access age for accessing social media to 16.
• In France, the leader has floated the idea of a ban for those under fifteen, and a government panel has recommended a comparable move, alongside an overnight "digital curfew" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The government in the Netherlands has urged families to block their children from social media until 15.

At the EU level, the bloc's legislature has passed a advisory motion calling for a ban for teenagers under 16 except if guardian approval is given. Even though it cautions of the "addictive" quality of these apps, the resolution does not create enforceable legislation.

"A clear age barrier is a useful foundation," commented the MEP driving the measure.

Britain: An Evidence-Based Stance

Across Britain, the leadership has kept open a potential ban, stating that "no option is being dismissed" but maintaining any policy must be "grounded in robust evidence".

Previously, momentum grew behind a legislative effort to enact controls on social media use by under-16s, but it was eventually weakened. Nonetheless, the government pledged to investigate the matter.

Charities have voiced apprehensions. A prominent charity established by the relatives of a teenager who took her own life after encountering dangerous platform posts argues that a blanket age ban might not improve online safety and could result in a "sudden drop-off" of harm when users become eligible.

"The Australian ban is a response to the failure of the social media companies to build platforms and apps that are secure and suitable for young users," said a prominent online safety campaigner.

America: A Decentralized Picture

Across America, regulation is largely unfolding at the regional level amid country-wide inaction.

• The state of Utah demands adult approval for under-18s to use social media and controls late-night use.
• Florida has signed a bill prohibiting those below 14 from accessing social media, though it is subject to constitutional disputes.
• Virginia has enacted a rule capping minors to a single hour of social media use per day, with additional time requiring parental permission.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have likewise enacted bills mandating parental consent for teenagers to create social media profiles.

Even with bipartisan support and proposals from some politicians to follow the Australian lead, a federal ban is currently seen as improbable.

Global Perspectives

Beyond these regions, additional countries are similarly considering moves.

• Malaysia intends to prohibit social media for teenagers effective next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has increased the minimum age for Instagram to 16.

However, international bodies adopt a more cautious stance. Unicef has warned that social media bans carry risks and "may even prove counterproductive". The agency points out that online platforms can be a "lifeline" for vulnerable youth and that regulation should not be a "replacement" for platform operators to invest in safety.

As this global discussion continues, the steps of this nation and others indicate that states internationally are less and less willing to stand by for the industry to act voluntarily.